| Economics | Socium | Environment |
|---|---|---|
Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development, 2019, 6 (25): 63-70
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/10
UDC 332.1 : 330.837(477)
JEL CLASSIFICATION: E11, Q24, Q28, R11, R12
Grygorii Sharyi
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-5355
Hanna Obykhod
Doctor of Economic Sciences,
Public Institution «Institute of Environmental Economics and
Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6803
Viktor Dubіschev
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-7054
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
Abstract: The institutional system in Ukraine, which is characterized by the rule of interests of the authorities over the interests of the society, neglect of the rights of business agents, as well as the use of power for the personal benefit of officials, is investigated. At the same time, the state is the main institution for sustainable development, which should determine the priority economic, social and environmental activities. Responsible institutions are obliged to develop the necessary mechanisms to ensure sustainability, strengthen positions in the areas of human capital development and improve the quality of life. New governance tools and mechanisms will facilitate the involvement of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development principles through renewed relationships between business entities based on equal partnership and the use of mechanisms to ensure the harmonization of business interests in achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability.
Irrationality, disproportionality, complexity of administrative-territorial entities of the united territorial communities were taken into account in this article. Ways of executive power institutionalization, development of territories in accordance with requirements of institutionalism, and its role and place in administrative-territorial reform were determined. It is argued that the only institutional set of society is an institutional matrix. Institutional matrix of society is presented as a stable triad of basic elements – macro-institutions that integrate and stabilize society: economy, politics, and culture. And the modernization of the system of public administration institutions, decentralization of powers to the level of united territorial communities should form a stable system of sustainable development of the territory and a safe socio-ecological and economic environment.
Key words: Ukrainian Decentralization of powers, executive power, sustainable development of territories, institutional matrix, territorial community, socio-ecological and economic security.
Language version: Ukrainian
References
1. Lukashevych, M.P. Sotsiolohiia ekonomiky [Sociology of Economics] Retrieved from http://tourlib.net/books_others/lukashevych25.htm. [in Ukrainian].
2. Polani, K. (2002). Velikaia transformatciia: politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni [The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time]. Sankt Peterburg : Aleteiia [in Russian].
3. Nort, D. (2005). Vklad neoinstutcionalizma v ponimanie problem perekhodnoi ekonomiki [The contribution of neo-institutionalism to understanding the problems of transition economies]. Retrieved from http://ie.boom.ru/Referat/North.htm. [in Russian].
4. Bohoiavlenska, Yu.V., & Shaposhnykov, K.S. (2010). Evoliutsiia instytutsionalnoi teorii v konteksti transformatsii suchasnykh ekonomichnykh system [The evolution of institutional theory in the context of the transformation of modern economic systems]. Zhytomyr : ZhDTU [in Ukrainian].
5. Bortis, H. (2007). Instytutsii, povedinka ta ekonomichna teoriia: Vnesok do klasyko-keinsianskoi politychnoi ekonomii [Institutions, Behavior, and Economic Theory: A Contribution to the Classic-Keynesian Political Economy]. Kyiv : Vyd. dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia» [in Ukrainian].
6. Nort, D. (2000). Instytutsii, instytutsiina zmina ta funktsionuvannia ekonomiky [Institutions, institutional change and functioning of the economy]. Kyiv : Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
7. Molodtsov, O.V. (2016). Metodolohichni aspekty teorii instytutsionalnykh matryts u konteksti dynamiky instytutsionalnykh zmin [Methodological Aspects of Institutional Matrix Theory in the Context of Dynamics of Institutional Change]. Retrieved from http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2016_2/8.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kravtsiv, V.S. (Eds.). (2016). Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii Ukrainy: metodolohichni osnovy ta praktyka reformuvannia [Administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine: methodological foundations and practice of reform]. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
9. Melnyk, A.F. (Eds.). (2012). Strukturni transformatsii v natsionalnii ekonomitsi: problemy diahnostyky ta instytutsiinoho zabezpechennia [Structural transformations in the national economy: problems of diagnostics and institutional support]. Ternopil : TNEU [in Ukrainian].
10. Sharyi, H.I. (2016). Instytutsiine zabezpechennia rozvytku zemelnykh vidnosyn v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrainy [Institutional support for the development of land relations in the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Poltava [in Ukrainian].
11. Kovbasiuk, Yu.V., & Orlatyi, M.K. (Eds.). (2015). Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [The administrative and territorial structure of the countries of the European Union]. Kyiv : NADU [in Ukrainian].
Article publication date: 2019
Date of online version: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/10
UDC 332.1 : 330.837(477)
JEL CLASSIFICATION: E11, Q24, Q28, R11, R12
Grygorii Sharyi
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9073-5355
Hanna Obykhod
Doctor of Economic Sciences,
Public Institution «Institute of Environmental Economics and
Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine»
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6803
Viktor Dubіschev
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-7054
METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF TERRITORIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS
Abstract: The institutional system in Ukraine, which is characterized by the rule of interests of the authorities over the interests of the society, neglect of the rights of business agents, as well as the use of power for the personal benefit of officials, is investigated. At the same time, the state is the main institution for sustainable development, which should determine the priority economic, social and environmental activities. Responsible institutions are obliged to develop the necessary mechanisms to ensure sustainability, strengthen positions in the areas of human capital development and improve the quality of life. New governance tools and mechanisms will facilitate the involvement of the private sector in the implementation of sustainable development principles through renewed relationships between business entities based on equal partnership and the use of mechanisms to ensure the harmonization of business interests in achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability.
Irrationality, disproportionality, complexity of administrative-territorial entities of the united territorial communities were taken into account in this article. Ways of executive power institutionalization, development of territories in accordance with requirements of institutionalism, and its role and place in administrative-territorial reform were determined. It is argued that the only institutional set of society is an institutional matrix. Institutional matrix of society is presented as a stable triad of basic elements – macro-institutions that integrate and stabilize society: economy, politics, and culture. And the modernization of the system of public administration institutions, decentralization of powers to the level of united territorial communities should form a stable system of sustainable development of the territory and a safe socio-ecological and economic environment.
Key words: Ukrainian Decentralization of powers, executive power, sustainable development of territories, institutional matrix, territorial community, socio-ecological and economic security.
Language version: Ukrainian
References
1. Lukashevych, M.P. Sotsiolohiia ekonomiky [Sociology of Economics] Retrieved from http://tourlib.net/books_others/lukashevych25.htm. [in Ukrainian].
2. Polani, K. (2002). Velikaia transformatciia: politicheskie i ekonomicheskie istoki nashego vremeni [The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time]. Sankt Peterburg : Aleteiia [in Russian].
3. Nort, D. (2005). Vklad neoinstutcionalizma v ponimanie problem perekhodnoi ekonomiki [The contribution of neo-institutionalism to understanding the problems of transition economies]. Retrieved from http://ie.boom.ru/Referat/North.htm. [in Russian].
4. Bohoiavlenska, Yu.V., & Shaposhnykov, K.S. (2010). Evoliutsiia instytutsionalnoi teorii v konteksti transformatsii suchasnykh ekonomichnykh system [The evolution of institutional theory in the context of the transformation of modern economic systems]. Zhytomyr : ZhDTU [in Ukrainian].
5. Bortis, H. (2007). Instytutsii, povedinka ta ekonomichna teoriia: Vnesok do klasyko-keinsianskoi politychnoi ekonomii [Institutions, Behavior, and Economic Theory: A Contribution to the Classic-Keynesian Political Economy]. Kyiv : Vyd. dim «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia» [in Ukrainian].
6. Nort, D. (2000). Instytutsii, instytutsiina zmina ta funktsionuvannia ekonomiky [Institutions, institutional change and functioning of the economy]. Kyiv : Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
7. Molodtsov, O.V. (2016). Metodolohichni aspekty teorii instytutsionalnykh matryts u konteksti dynamiky instytutsionalnykh zmin [Methodological Aspects of Institutional Matrix Theory in the Context of Dynamics of Institutional Change]. Retrieved from http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2016_2/8.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
8. Kravtsiv, V.S. (Eds.). (2016). Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii Ukrainy: metodolohichni osnovy ta praktyka reformuvannia [Administrative-territorial structure of Ukraine: methodological foundations and practice of reform]. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
9. Melnyk, A.F. (Eds.). (2012). Strukturni transformatsii v natsionalnii ekonomitsi: problemy diahnostyky ta instytutsiinoho zabezpechennia [Structural transformations in the national economy: problems of diagnostics and institutional support]. Ternopil : TNEU [in Ukrainian].
10. Sharyi, H.I. (2016). Instytutsiine zabezpechennia rozvytku zemelnykh vidnosyn v ahrarnomu sektori Ukrainy [Institutional support for the development of land relations in the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Poltava [in Ukrainian].
11. Kovbasiuk, Yu.V., & Orlatyi, M.K. (Eds.). (2015). Administratyvno-terytorialnyi ustrii krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [The administrative and territorial structure of the countries of the European Union]. Kyiv : NADU [in Ukrainian].
Article publication date: 2019
Date of online version: 2019